Whomwah.com

So Google have just released their new web browser, Chrome (in beta on Windoze, other OS’s following soon). I’ve had a play and much like many other people have found it:

• Lightning fast UI
• Lightning fast JS execution thanks to V8
• Lightweight, or at least it gives that impression as the UI is very, very simple
• Stable *well this is to be seen, but each tab running with it’s own process should help*

Now, I don’t think Google built this browser with the main intention of trying to compete with other browser vendors. I think they built it as a UI for all their web apps. If you want to use it to browse other websites, then obviously it does that just fine, but it has been optimised to make Google’s suite of web apps ( Gmail, Calendar, Docs etc ) run super smooth, like desktop apps, and with Gears you can work offline, like desktop apps. You can see this in the design; the V8 JavaScript Engine has been “specifically designed for fast execution of large JavaScript applications”, the fact that each tab runs in it’s own process. If you have Gmail in one tab, Calendar in the other, it’s the same as having two applications open, if one crashes the other one just keeps working fine. The simple UI design. It wants to be as simple as possible, if it’s just a frame for the application inside.

I think that people could end up using Chrome AND another browser in tandem, and just using Chrome for their web/desktop apps ( Email, Calendar etc ). I personally hate mixing my web browsing with email and calendar, it all gets so messy and I like to have that distinction.

I’d be interested in what other people think, and if/how they will use Chrome?

My friend Michael wrote The Simple Joys of Web-Scale Identifiers, and it made me think about about problems I’m having, because I didn’t think about my username as a unique-identifier.

I got married almost a year ago, and part of the process was changing my surname from Ponting to Robertson (the reasons may be in another post one day). The actual process of changing your name is very simple in the UK, in fact you can do it online for about £30. The real pain has been changing everything else! Changing banks details etc is boring, but easily do-able. It’s websites and more importantly usernames that are the bind. You see, here’s some urls to sites I am registered with:

• http://www.flickr.com/photos/duncanponting
• http://del.icio.us/whomwah
• http://www.last.fm/user/duncanponting
• http://twitter.com/whomwah
• http://www.dopplr.com/traveller/whomwah

The problem is I never really thought about the username when I registered with all my favourite sites. I’m now being bitten by that lack of thought. You see, I am no longer known as Duncan Ponting, I am Duncan Robertson, so the username of duncanponting no longer makes sense. As you can see I have used whomwah in some cases where I have been able to change, once I had realised the error of my ways, but sites don’t always let you do that, fair enough.

So, what does this mean? Well nothing in the grand scheme of things, but it does mean that if you wanted to aggregate stuff about me –yeah, I know but just say you did– just by using my username, it’s not gonna get you too far right now. You are going to have to change tack, and use something else. You could scrape the XFN data on my homepage, or maybe via Googles Social Graph API. The My Connections App pulls back loads of great stuff.

These simple examples work, and would get you some of the data you want, but if I had seen my username as a unique-identifier when I first started registering with various websites, you would be able to get all this stuff just using that. So note to self, If I ever get to do all this stuff again.

Find a username, don’t make it to something that could change, and use it for everything.